<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crime against credibility: the &#8220;Under Construction&#8221; notice</title>
	<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/</link>
	<description>A resource for building user-friendly websites and intranets</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4647</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4647</guid>
		<description>Thanks for letting me know, Roger! All the best for your new web project ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for letting me know, Roger! All the best for your new web project <img src='http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>you changed mine :)

After thinking about it you are right we are going though a change from a "canned" solution from a company to our own grassroots effort. 

I just put up the basics and will leave out the obvious... under construction ... notice out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you changed mine <img src='http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>After thinking about it you are right we are going though a change from a &#8220;canned&#8221; solution from a company to our own grassroots effort. </p>
<p>I just put up the basics and will leave out the obvious&#8230; under construction &#8230; notice out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve Léonard</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4557</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve Léonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4557</guid>
		<description>Neville:

Thanks for this note! I noticed that many people come to this post searching for "under construction" graphics, and I always wondered if I managed to change anyone's mind!

Eve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neville:</p>
<p>Thanks for this note! I noticed that many people come to this post searching for &#8220;under construction&#8221; graphics, and I always wondered if I managed to change anyone&#8217;s mind!</p>
<p>Eve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neville</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4553</link>
		<dc:creator>Neville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-4553</guid>
		<description>Came across this article much by accident and found it quite sound I am in the middle of a site build just now and I was going to use some under construction anims for some of the pages (I am easily amused).  The owner to be of the site has supplied me with material for all the pages he wants but I do not think a lot of the graphics will do his site justice.  He is a quality tradesman but lousy photographer.

I now think I will just not publish the full home page but will leave out the links to the unfinished pages, and just open up the links as the pages complete.  I suppose a natural sort of growth in the site.

Thanks Neville</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across this article much by accident and found it quite sound I am in the middle of a site build just now and I was going to use some under construction anims for some of the pages (I am easily amused).  The owner to be of the site has supplied me with material for all the pages he wants but I do not think a lot of the graphics will do his site justice.  He is a quality tradesman but lousy photographer.</p>
<p>I now think I will just not publish the full home page but will leave out the links to the unfinished pages, and just open up the links as the pages complete.  I suppose a natural sort of growth in the site.</p>
<p>Thanks Neville</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve Léonard</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3607</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve Léonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3607</guid>
		<description>Jon: 

You are right, these graphics do have their place on the web... in a virtual museum!

Cheers,

Eve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon: </p>
<p>You are right, these graphics do have their place on the web&#8230; in a virtual museum!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Eve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve Léonard</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve Léonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>Slavi:

In my opinion, if a site is under heavy development, it is not ready to be published yet. I agree with you that broken links and "bugs" also hurt credibility. So why not wait until the site is ready and bug-free before publishing? Bugs will annoy people whether or not there is an "under construction" notice on the website.

If you have no choice but to publish something that is unfinished, I suggest hiding all features that are not functional, so that they will not be clicked.

Thanks for your input,

Eve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slavi:</p>
<p>In my opinion, if a site is under heavy development, it is not ready to be published yet. I agree with you that broken links and &#8220;bugs&#8221; also hurt credibility. So why not wait until the site is ready and bug-free before publishing? Bugs will annoy people whether or not there is an &#8220;under construction&#8221; notice on the website.</p>
<p>If you have no choice but to publish something that is unfinished, I suggest hiding all features that are not functional, so that they will not be clicked.</p>
<p>Thanks for your input,</p>
<p>Eve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetoslav</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3600</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetoslav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3600</guid>
		<description>Hello,

What do you suggest developers/designers to put on a site that is currently in a heavy development ?
It is partially ready but not yet fully functional.

I think bugs would annoy people much more compared to "Under Construction" or "Coming Soon" texts.

Slavi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>What do you suggest developers/designers to put on a site that is currently in a heavy development ?<br />
It is partially ready but not yet fully functional.</p>
<p>I think bugs would annoy people much more compared to &#8220;Under Construction&#8221; or &#8220;Coming Soon&#8221; texts.</p>
<p>Slavi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allegracom.ca/lucidweb/2007/07/22/#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>How about irony? I think that under construction gifs have a certain late nineties retro chic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about irony? I think that under construction gifs have a certain late nineties retro chic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
